![]() |
Coat of Arms of the American Church Union Rendered by Chad Krouse, 2025 |
![]() |
Image of the American Church Union coat of arms Image source: Woodruff (1936, November 11), page 621 |
![]() |
Advertisement appearing as early as 1912 in Living Church Annual (1912), p.467 |
![]() |
Side by side comparison of the arms of the United States of America and those of the American Church Union Rendered by Chad Krouse, 2025 |
In the absence of any additional known data concerning the arms of the American Church Union, we can render a few informed guesses as to the design rationale.
These arms represent the state of heraldry in the Episcopal Church at the turn of the 20th century--the very purpose Pierre de Chaignon la Rose (1872-1941) saw in his heraldic work to correct by creating simple, clear, and perspicuous heraldry.
First, we know by the dates involved these arms predate the 1940 adoption of arms of the Episcopal Church. The lack of any unifying national symbol for the Episcopal Church in the earlier 20th century likely caused the designer to use the arms of the United States of America as the basis to show the organization's national scope. I believe that much is quite clear when comparing ACU's arms with those of the US as seen above.
![]() |
Arms of the American Church Union Rendered by Chad Krouse, 2025 |
![]() |
Two possible revisions for the arms of the American Church Union Designed and rendered by Chad Krouse, 2025 |
The first idea of mine was to draw out the inescutcheon and work with the image of the Lamb of God while still incorporating the three ideas of doctrine, discipline, and worship.
![]() |
Revision Example 1 Designed and rendered by Chad Krouse, 2025 |
![]() |
Revision Example 2 Designed and rendered by Chad Krouse, 2025 |
The second idea emerged as my preference of the pair. With this design, I wanted to strip away as much fussiness as possible with a clear and simple design.
![]() |
Side by side comparison of two design ideas Designed and rendered by Chad Krouse, 2025 |
Using the arms of the US as the basis to form the bordure would provide a reference to the national scope of the organization, while the chalice and host in pale provides clear catholic identification which would likely have been known to many at that time. I think it could be argued that doctrine, discipline, and worship can all three be represented in a singular "catholic," emblem of sorts. I believe all three are implied. Regardless, the chalice and host create a simple and clear design.
![]() |
Had the Episcopal Church's coat of arms been designed then, here's an example of using those as the bordure. Designed and rendered by Chad Krouse, 2025 |
I had two versions in mind here: one to place the fleur-de-lis on the chalice playing on the Blessed Virgin Mary's role in the Incarnation (a very catholic position), or even more simply to have the monogram of the Holy Name placed on the host.
I think either would work, but the latter is becoming my favorite.
![]() |
My favorite version of the revised arms of ACU Designed and rendered by Chad Krouse, 2025 |
In summary, the arms of the American Church Union represent the state of heraldry in the Episcopal Church at the turn of the 20th century and underscore the need for a unifying national church emblem.
La Rose's emergence on the heraldic scene would help steer the fanciful impulses for heraldry towards a more simpler and dignified approach, employing a systematic framework for designing new corporate arms while establishing a standard for others to later follow.
Works Cited
Living Church Annual (1912). The Living Church Annual and Whittaker's Churchman's Almanac. Milwaukee: The Young Churchman Company.
Woodruff, Clinton R. (1936, November 28). An earlier Church Union. The Living Church, 621-622.
0 comments:
Post a Comment